Typically
the commissioning process is facilitated by the Internet
as is the briefing process. This is not to say that
<OLDtechnologies>
have no place, they do! Rather,
ever expanding communication opportunities allow for
new collaborations that are multidimensional, dynamic
and unconstrained by place but at the same
time 'the making' is invariably informed by the commissioner's
placedness and storytelling. |
|
By
simply manipulating precious materials one does not
make jewels. The interplay between materials their materiality
and 'process' informs jewels. <JEWELmaking>
responds to all this but ultimately there is storytelling
to do with relationships, place, people and more. This
is at the heart of a <JEWELmaker's>
relationship between material, a story and ultimately,
its possessor/keeper. Stories exist in our collective
cultural memories, and jewels carry <CULTURALcargo>
that is finally recounted in the wearer's/possessor's
stories and storytelling. <JEWELmakers>
tell reinterpret & reiterate
stories. We think that a jewel without a story
is no jewel at all
'Preciousness'
is an expansive idea.
The Egyptians imagined gold as <GODflesh>,
the Incas imagined it as <GODdroppings>
and silver as <MOONtears>. Similarly,
gems are invested with symbolism and meaning. The cutting
of gems has been equated with the shaping of the soul
and their possession with the realisation of self and
enlightenment. Pearls can signify <THEfeminine>,
chastity and purity; onyx spiritual strength and conjugal
happiness; and diamonds innocence, invincibility and
sincerity. In unison, maker and wearer evoke meaning,
magic and preciousness in jewels – often with
various parts of the body in mind.
For
jewels, the relationship between maker and possessor
is loaded and that's as it should be.
|